🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.